Dominican Republic vs Oman: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score

Dominican Republic
56.25
in 2013
Oman
56.25
in 2013
Dominican Republic rank
78th
Oman rank
78th

Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Oman
0204060200420082013

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 56.25 against 56.25 in Oman, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 78th and Oman ranks 78th of 181 countries.

Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Oman Difference Ahead
2000s 54.17 33.33 20.83 Dominican Republic
2010s 56.25 50 6.25 Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Dominican Republic or Oman?
Dominican Republic, at 56.25 against 56.25 in Oman as of 2013.
What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Dominican Republic and Oman?
0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Oman?
10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
How do Dominican Republic and Oman rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
Dominican Republic ranks 78th and Oman ranks 78th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,785 data points, 2004–2013
Last refreshed

The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.