Gambia, The vs Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Gambia, The
- Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of
How they compare
Gambia, The currently reports 31.25 against 31.25 in Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Gambia, The ahead.
Gambia, The ranks 160th and Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of ranks 160th of 183 countries.
Gambia, The has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia, The | Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.25 | 12.5 | 18.75 | Gambia, The |
| 2010s | 31.25 | 17.19 | 14.06 | Gambia, The |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Gambia, The or Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of?
- Gambia, The, at 31.25 against 31.25 in Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Gambia, The and Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of?
- 0, with Gambia, The ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia, The and Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Gambia, The and Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Gambia, The ranks 160th and Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of ranks 160th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.