Georgia vs Malaysia: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Georgia
93.75
in 2013
Malaysia
100
in 2013
Georgia rank
3rd
Malaysia rank
1st
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Georgia
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 100 against 93.75 in Georgia, a difference of 6.25.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 3rd and Malaysia ranks 1st of 181 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.58 | 92.71 | 53.12 | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 89.06 | 100 | 10.94 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Georgia or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 100 against 93.75 in Georgia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Georgia and Malaysia?
- 6.25, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Malaysia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Georgia and Malaysia rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Georgia ranks 3rd and Malaysia ranks 1st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.