Hong Kong vs Kosovo: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Hong Kong
93.75
in 2013
Kosovo
81.25
in 2013
Hong Kong rank
3rd
Kosovo rank
25th
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Hong Kong
- Kosovo
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 93.75 against 81.25 in Kosovo, a difference of 12.5.
That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.2 times Kosovo's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 3rd and Kosovo ranks 25th of 184 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Kosovo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 93.75 | 81.25 | 12.5 | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 93.75 | 81.25 | 12.5 | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Hong Kong or Kosovo?
- Hong Kong, at 93.75 against 81.25 in Kosovo as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Hong Kong and Kosovo?
- 12.5, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Kosovo?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Hong Kong and Kosovo rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Hong Kong ranks 3rd and Kosovo ranks 25th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.