Ireland vs North Macedonia, Republic of: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Ireland
87.5
in 2013
North Macedonia, Republic of
87.5
in 2013
Ireland rank
12th
North Macedonia, Republic of rank
12th
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Ireland
- North Macedonia, Republic of
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 87.5 against 87.5 in North Macedonia, Republic of, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Ireland ahead.
Ireland ranks 12th and North Macedonia, Republic of ranks 12th of 183 countries.
Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | North Macedonia, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.5 | 43.75 | 43.75 | Ireland |
| 2010s | 87.5 | 70.31 | 17.19 | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Ireland or North Macedonia, Republic of?
- Ireland, at 87.5 against 87.5 in North Macedonia, Republic of as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Ireland and North Macedonia, Republic of?
- 0, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and North Macedonia, Republic of?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Ireland and North Macedonia, Republic of rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Ireland ranks 12th and North Macedonia, Republic of ranks 12th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.