Malaysia vs New Zealand: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Malaysia
- New Zealand
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 100 against 93.75 in New Zealand, a difference of 6.25.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was New Zealand ahead.
Malaysia ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 3rd of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 92.71 | 93.75 | 1.04 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 100 | 93.75 | 6.25 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Malaysia or New Zealand?
- Malaysia, at 100 against 93.75 in New Zealand as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Malaysia and New Zealand?
- 6.25, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and New Zealand?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Malaysia and New Zealand rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Malaysia ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 3rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.