Marshall Islands vs Micronesia (country): Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Marshall Islands
56.25
in 2013
Micronesia (country)
56.25
in 2013
Marshall Islands rank
78th
Micronesia (country) rank
78th
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Marshall Islands
- Micronesia (country)
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 56.25 against 56.25 in Micronesia (country), a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Micronesia (country) has been ahead every year.
Marshall Islands ranks 78th and Micronesia (country) ranks 78th of 181 countries.
Micronesia (country) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Micronesia (country) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.25 | 43.75 | 12.5 | Micronesia (country) |
| 2010s | 56.25 | 56.25 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Marshall Islands or Micronesia (country)?
- Marshall Islands, at 56.25 against 56.25 in Micronesia (country) as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Marshall Islands and Micronesia (country)?
- 0, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Micronesia (country)?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Marshall Islands and Micronesia (country) rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Marshall Islands ranks 78th and Micronesia (country) ranks 78th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.