Marshall Islands, Republic of the vs Nicaragua: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Marshall Islands, Republic of the
56.25
in 2013
Nicaragua
56.25
in 2013
Marshall Islands, Republic of the rank
79th
Nicaragua rank
79th
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Marshall Islands, Republic of the
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Marshall Islands, Republic of the currently reports 56.25 against 56.25 in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Marshall Islands, Republic of the ranks 79th and Nicaragua ranks 79th of 183 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands, Republic of the | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.25 | 50 | 18.75 | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 56.25 | 56.25 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Marshall Islands, Republic of the or Nicaragua?
- Marshall Islands, Republic of the, at 56.25 against 56.25 in Nicaragua as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Marshall Islands, Republic of the and Nicaragua?
- 0, with Marshall Islands, Republic of the ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands, Republic of the and Nicaragua?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Marshall Islands, Republic of the and Nicaragua rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Marshall Islands, Republic of the ranks 79th and Nicaragua ranks 79th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.