Marshall Islands, Republic of the vs Türkiye, Republic of: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Marshall Islands, Republic of the
- Türkiye, Republic of
How they compare
Marshall Islands, Republic of the currently reports 56.25 against 56.25 in Türkiye, Republic of, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Türkiye, Republic of has been ahead every year.
Marshall Islands, Republic of the ranks 79th and Türkiye, Republic of ranks 79th of 183 countries.
Türkiye, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands, Republic of the | Türkiye, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.25 | 54.17 | 22.92 | Türkiye, Republic of |
| 2010s | 56.25 | 56.25 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Marshall Islands, Republic of the or Türkiye, Republic of?
- Marshall Islands, Republic of the, at 56.25 against 56.25 in Türkiye, Republic of as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Marshall Islands, Republic of the and Türkiye, Republic of?
- 0, with Marshall Islands, Republic of the ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands, Republic of the and Türkiye, Republic of?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Marshall Islands, Republic of the and Türkiye, Republic of rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Marshall Islands, Republic of the ranks 79th and Türkiye, Republic of ranks 79th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.