Micronesia (country) vs Nigeria: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score

Micronesia (country)
56.25
in 2013
Nigeria
56.25
in 2013
Micronesia (country) rank
78th
Nigeria rank
78th

Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time

  • Micronesia (country)
  • Nigeria
0204060200420082013

How they compare

Micronesia (country) currently reports 56.25 against 56.25 in Nigeria, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Nigeria has been ahead every year.

Micronesia (country) ranks 78th and Nigeria ranks 78th of 181 countries.

Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia (country) Nigeria Difference Ahead
2000s 43.75 56.25 12.5 Nigeria
2010s 56.25 56.25 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Micronesia (country) or Nigeria?
Micronesia (country), at 56.25 against 56.25 in Nigeria as of 2013.
What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Micronesia (country) and Nigeria?
0, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Nigeria?
10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
How do Micronesia (country) and Nigeria rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
Micronesia (country) ranks 78th and Nigeria ranks 78th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,785 data points, 2004–2013
Last refreshed

The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.