Micronesia (country) vs Solomon Islands: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Micronesia (country)
56.25
in 2013
Solomon Islands
56.25
in 2013
Micronesia (country) rank
78th
Solomon Islands rank
78th
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Micronesia (country)
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Micronesia (country) currently reports 56.25 against 56.25 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Micronesia (country) ahead.
Micronesia (country) ranks 78th and Solomon Islands ranks 78th of 181 countries.
Micronesia (country) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia (country) | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.75 | 25 | 18.75 | Micronesia (country) |
| 2010s | 56.25 | 56.25 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Micronesia (country) or Solomon Islands?
- Micronesia (country), at 56.25 against 56.25 in Solomon Islands as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Micronesia (country) and Solomon Islands?
- 0, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Solomon Islands?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Micronesia (country) and Solomon Islands rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 78th and Solomon Islands ranks 78th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.