Micronesia (country) vs United Arab Emirates: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Micronesia (country)
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Micronesia (country) currently reports 56.25 against 56.25 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Micronesia (country) ahead.
Micronesia (country) ranks 80th and United Arab Emirates ranks 80th of 184 countries.
Micronesia (country) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia (country) | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.75 | 35.42 | 8.33 | Micronesia (country) |
| 2010s | 56.25 | 56.25 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Micronesia (country) or United Arab Emirates?
- Micronesia (country), at 56.25 against 56.25 in United Arab Emirates as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Micronesia (country) and United Arab Emirates?
- 0, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and United Arab Emirates?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Micronesia (country) and United Arab Emirates rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 80th and United Arab Emirates ranks 80th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.