Montenegro vs North Macedonia, Republic of: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Montenegro
87.5
in 2013
North Macedonia, Republic of
87.5
in 2013
Montenegro rank
12th
North Macedonia, Republic of rank
12th
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Montenegro
- North Macedonia, Republic of
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 87.5 against 87.5 in North Macedonia, Republic of, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Montenegro ranks 12th and North Macedonia, Republic of ranks 12th of 183 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | North Macedonia, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.88 | 46.88 | 25 | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 84.38 | 70.31 | 14.06 | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Montenegro or North Macedonia, Republic of?
- Montenegro, at 87.5 against 87.5 in North Macedonia, Republic of as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Montenegro and North Macedonia, Republic of?
- 0, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and North Macedonia, Republic of?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2013.
- How do Montenegro and North Macedonia, Republic of rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Montenegro ranks 12th and North Macedonia, Republic of ranks 12th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.