North Macedonia vs Rwanda: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score

North Macedonia
87.5
in 2013
Rwanda
87.5
in 2013
North Macedonia rank
12th
Rwanda rank
12th

Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Rwanda
20406080200420082013

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 87.5 against 87.5 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was North Macedonia ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 12th and Rwanda ranks 12th of 181 countries.

North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Rwanda Difference Ahead
2000s 43.75 17.71 26.04 North Macedonia
2010s 70.31 64.06 6.25 North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, North Macedonia or Rwanda?
North Macedonia, at 87.5 against 87.5 in Rwanda as of 2013.
What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between North Macedonia and Rwanda?
0, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Rwanda?
10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
How do North Macedonia and Rwanda rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
North Macedonia ranks 12th and Rwanda ranks 12th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,785 data points, 2004–2013
Last refreshed

The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.