North Macedonia, Republic of vs Zambia: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
North Macedonia, Republic of
87.5
in 2013
Zambia
87.5
in 2013
North Macedonia, Republic of rank
12th
Zambia rank
12th
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- North Macedonia, Republic of
- Zambia
How they compare
North Macedonia, Republic of currently reports 87.5 against 87.5 in Zambia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Zambia ahead.
North Macedonia, Republic of ranks 12th and Zambia ranks 12th of 183 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia, Republic of | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.75 | 56.25 | 12.5 | Zambia |
| 2010s | 70.31 | 71.88 | 1.56 | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, North Macedonia, Republic of or Zambia?
- North Macedonia, Republic of, at 87.5 against 87.5 in Zambia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between North Macedonia, Republic of and Zambia?
- 0, with North Macedonia, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia, Republic of and Zambia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do North Macedonia, Republic of and Zambia rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- North Macedonia, Republic of ranks 12th and Zambia ranks 12th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.