Oman vs United Arab Emirates: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score

Oman
56.25
in 2013
United Arab Emirates
56.25
in 2013
Oman rank
78th
United Arab Emirates rank
78th

Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time

  • Oman
  • United Arab Emirates
0204060200420082013

How they compare

Oman currently reports 56.25 against 56.25 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.

Oman ranks 78th and United Arab Emirates ranks 78th of 181 countries.

United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oman United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
2000s 33.33 35.42 2.08 United Arab Emirates
2010s 50 56.25 6.25 United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Oman or United Arab Emirates?
Oman, at 56.25 against 56.25 in United Arab Emirates as of 2013.
What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Oman and United Arab Emirates?
0, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and United Arab Emirates?
10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
How do Oman and United Arab Emirates rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
Oman ranks 78th and United Arab Emirates ranks 78th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,785 data points, 2004–2013
Last refreshed

The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.