Papua New Guinea vs Syrian Arab Republic: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 31.25 against 25 in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 6.25.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Syrian Arab Republic's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 161st and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 164th of 184 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.25 | 8.33 | 22.92 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 31.25 | 15.62 | 15.62 | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Papua New Guinea or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Papua New Guinea, at 31.25 against 25 in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Papua New Guinea and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 6.25, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 161st and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 164th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.