Papua New Guinea vs Timor-Leste: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Papua New Guinea
31.25
in 2013
Timor-Leste
31.25
in 2013
Papua New Guinea rank
160th
Timor-Leste rank
160th
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 31.25 against 31.25 in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 160th and Timor-Leste ranks 160th of 183 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.25 | 12.5 | 18.75 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 31.25 | 17.19 | 14.06 | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Papua New Guinea or Timor-Leste?
- Papua New Guinea, at 31.25 against 31.25 in Timor-Leste as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Papua New Guinea and Timor-Leste?
- 0, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Timor-Leste?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Timor-Leste rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 160th and Timor-Leste ranks 160th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.