Poland vs United Kingdom: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score

Poland
93.75
in 2013
United Kingdom
100
in 2013
Poland rank
3rd
United Kingdom rank
1st

Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time

  • Poland
  • United Kingdom
020406080100200420082013

How they compare

United Kingdom currently reports 100 against 93.75 in Poland, a difference of 6.25.

That makes United Kingdom's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.

Poland ranks 3rd and United Kingdom ranks 1st of 181 countries.

United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland United Kingdom Difference Ahead
2000s 81.25 100 18.75 United Kingdom
2010s 93.75 100 6.25 United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Poland or United Kingdom?
United Kingdom, at 100 against 93.75 in Poland as of 2013.
What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Poland and United Kingdom?
6.25, with United Kingdom ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and United Kingdom?
10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
How do Poland and United Kingdom rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
Poland ranks 3rd and United Kingdom ranks 1st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,785 data points, 2004–2013
Last refreshed

The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.