Samoa vs St. Vincent and the Grenadines: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Samoa
43.75
in 2013
St. Vincent and the Grenadines
43.75
in 2013
Samoa rank
118th
St. Vincent and the Grenadines rank
118th
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Samoa
- St. Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 43.75 against 43.75 in St. Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, St. Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.
Samoa ranks 118th and St. Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 118th of 183 countries.
St. Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.75 | 43.75 | 5 | St. Vincent and the Grenadines |
| 2010s | 43.75 | 43.75 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Samoa or St. Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Samoa, at 43.75 against 43.75 in St. Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Samoa and St. Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and St. Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Samoa and St. Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Samoa ranks 118th and St. Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 118th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.