Sao Tome and Principe vs Senegal: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Sao Tome and Principe
37.5
in 2013
Senegal
37.5
in 2013
Sao Tome and Principe rank
139th
Senegal rank
139th
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- Senegal
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 37.5 against 37.5 in Senegal, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Senegal has been ahead every year.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 139th and Senegal ranks 139th of 184 countries.
Senegal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sao Tome and Principe | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.5 | 18.75 | 6.25 | Senegal |
| 2010s | 18.75 | 32.81 | 14.06 | Senegal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Sao Tome and Principe or Senegal?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 37.5 against 37.5 in Senegal as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Sao Tome and Principe and Senegal?
- 0, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Senegal?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and Senegal rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 139th and Senegal ranks 139th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.