Sierra Leone vs Venezuela, República Bolivariana de: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Sierra Leone
- Venezuela, República Bolivariana de
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 43.75 against 43.75 in Venezuela, República Bolivariana de, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Venezuela, República Bolivariana de ahead.
Sierra Leone ranks 118th and Venezuela, República Bolivariana de ranks 118th of 183 countries.
Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sierra Leone | Venezuela, República Bolivariana de | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.33 | 20.83 | 12.5 | Sierra Leone |
| 2010s | 43.75 | 35.94 | 7.81 | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Sierra Leone or Venezuela, República Bolivariana de?
- Sierra Leone, at 43.75 against 43.75 in Venezuela, República Bolivariana de as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Sierra Leone and Venezuela, República Bolivariana de?
- 0, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Venezuela, República Bolivariana de?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Sierra Leone and Venezuela, República Bolivariana de rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Sierra Leone ranks 118th and Venezuela, República Bolivariana de ranks 118th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.