Solomon Islands vs United Arab Emirates: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Solomon Islands
56.25
in 2013
United Arab Emirates
56.25
in 2013
Solomon Islands rank
79th
United Arab Emirates rank
79th
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Solomon Islands
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 56.25 against 56.25 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, United Arab Emirates has been ahead every year.
Solomon Islands ranks 79th and United Arab Emirates ranks 79th of 183 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Solomon Islands | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25 | 35.42 | 10.42 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 56.25 | 56.25 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Solomon Islands or United Arab Emirates?
- Solomon Islands, at 56.25 against 56.25 in United Arab Emirates as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Solomon Islands and United Arab Emirates?
- 0, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and United Arab Emirates?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Solomon Islands and United Arab Emirates rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Solomon Islands ranks 79th and United Arab Emirates ranks 79th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.