Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Palestine, State of: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 37.5 against 37.5 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 139th and Palestine, State of ranks 139th of 184 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.75 | 13.75 | 30 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 42.19 | 29.69 | 12.5 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Palestine, State of?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 37.5 against 37.5 in Palestine, State of as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Palestine, State of?
- 0, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Palestine, State of?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Palestine, State of rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 139th and Palestine, State of ranks 139th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.