Saint Vincent and the Grenadines vs Venezuela: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
- Venezuela
How they compare
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 43.75 against 43.75 in Venezuela, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 119th and Venezuela ranks 119th of 184 countries.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Venezuela | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.75 | 17.5 | 26.25 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
| 2010s | 43.75 | 35.94 | 7.81 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines or Venezuela?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 43.75 against 43.75 in Venezuela as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Venezuela?
- 0, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Venezuela?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Venezuela rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 119th and Venezuela ranks 119th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.