Suriname vs East Timor: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Suriname
25
in 2013
East Timor
31.25
in 2013
Suriname rank
162nd
East Timor rank
159th
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Suriname
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 31.25 against 25 in Suriname, a difference of 6.25.
That makes East Timor's figure about 1.2 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Suriname ahead.
Suriname ranks 162nd and East Timor ranks 159th of 181 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Suriname | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25 | 12.5 | 12.5 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 25 | 17.19 | 7.81 | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Suriname or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 31.25 against 25 in Suriname as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Suriname and East Timor?
- 6.25, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and East Timor?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Suriname and East Timor rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Suriname ranks 162nd and East Timor ranks 159th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.