Grenada vs Mali: Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score

Grenada
30
in 2019
Mali
30
in 2019
Grenada rank
153rd
Mali rank
153rd

Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Grenada
  • Mali
0102030201320162019

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 30 against 30 in Mali, a difference of 0.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Mali has been ahead every year.

Grenada ranks 153rd and Mali ranks 153rd of 191 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting credit (db15-20 methodology) - score, Grenada or Mali?
Grenada, at 30 against 30 in Mali as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting credit (db15-20 methodology) - score between Grenada and Mali?
0, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Mali?
7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
How do Grenada and Mali rank globally for getting credit (db15-20 methodology) - score?
Grenada ranks 153rd and Mali ranks 153rd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Grenada vs Mali: Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/getting-credit-db15-20-methodology-score/grenada/mali/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/getting-credit-db15-20-methodology-score/grenada/mali/">Grenada vs Mali: Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,335 data points, 2013–2019
Last refreshed

The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.