Armenia vs Dominican Republic: Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14)
Armenia
100
in 2013
Dominican Republic
100
in 2013
Armenia rank
1st
Dominican Republic rank
1st
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) over time
- Armenia
- Dominican Republic
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 100 against 100 in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Dominican Republic has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 1st and Dominican Republic ranks 1st of 184 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Dominican Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.67 | 94.44 | 52.78 | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 95.83 | 100 | 4.17 | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14), Armenia or Dominican Republic?
- Armenia, at 100 against 100 in Dominican Republic as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) between Armenia and Dominican Republic?
- 0, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Dominican Republic?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Armenia and Dominican Republic rank globally for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14)?
- Armenia ranks 1st and Dominican Republic ranks 1st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the depth of credit information benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.