Azerbaijan vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14)
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) over time
- Azerbaijan
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 83.33 against 83.33 in Iran, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 31st and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 31st of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Iran, Islamic Republic of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Iran, Islamic Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.89 | 50 | 36.11 | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
| 2010s | 83.33 | 75 | 8.33 | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14), Azerbaijan or Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- Azerbaijan, at 83.33 against 83.33 in Iran, Islamic Republic of as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) between Azerbaijan and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 0, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Azerbaijan and Iran, Islamic Republic of rank globally for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14)?
- Azerbaijan ranks 31st and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 31st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the depth of credit information benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.