Azerbaijan vs Palestine: Getting credit: Depth of credit information … 0-6 DB05-14 Score
Azerbaijan
83.33
in 2013
Palestine
83.33
in 2013
Azerbaijan rank
31st
Palestine rank
31st
Getting credit: Depth of credit information … 0-6 DB05-14 Score over time
- Azerbaijan
- Palestine
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 83.33 against 83.33 in Palestine, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Palestine ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 31st and Palestine ranks 31st of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Palestine in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.89 | 16.67 | 2.78 | Palestine |
| 2010s | 83.33 | 62.5 | 20.83 | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14), Azerbaijan or Palestine?
- Azerbaijan, at 83.33 against 83.33 in Palestine as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) between Azerbaijan and Palestine?
- 0, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Palestine?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Azerbaijan and Palestine rank globally for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14)?
- Azerbaijan ranks 31st and Palestine ranks 31st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the depth of credit information benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.