Belgium vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14)
Belgium
66.67
in 2013
Bosnia and Herzegovina
66.67
in 2013
Belgium rank
85th
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
85th
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) over time
- Belgium
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 85th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 85th of 184 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.67 | 83.33 | 16.67 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 75 | 8.33 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14), Belgium or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Belgium, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) between Belgium and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 0, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Belgium and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14)?
- Belgium ranks 85th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 85th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the depth of credit information benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.