Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Rwanda: Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14)
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) over time
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- Rwanda
How they compare
Bolivia, Plurinational State of currently reports 100 against 100 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 1st and Rwanda ranks 1st of 184 countries.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.44 | 0 | 94.44 | Bolivia, Plurinational State of |
| 2010s | 100 | 50 | 50 | Bolivia, Plurinational State of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14), Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Rwanda?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of, at 100 against 100 in Rwanda as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Rwanda?
- 0, with Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Rwanda?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Rwanda rank globally for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14)?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 1st and Rwanda ranks 1st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the depth of credit information benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.