Cape Verde vs Mongolia: Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14)
Cape Verde
83.33
in 2013
Mongolia
83.33
in 2013
Cape Verde rank
31st
Mongolia rank
31st
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) over time
- Cape Verde
- Mongolia
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 83.33 against 83.33 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 31st and Mongolia ranks 31st of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.67 | 40 | 6.67 | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 70.83 | 70.83 | 0 | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14), Cape Verde or Mongolia?
- Cape Verde, at 83.33 against 83.33 in Mongolia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) between Cape Verde and Mongolia?
- 0, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Mongolia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Cape Verde and Mongolia rank globally for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14)?
- Cape Verde ranks 31st and Mongolia ranks 31st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the depth of credit information benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.