Cape Verde vs New Zealand: Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14)
Cape Verde
83.33
in 2013
New Zealand
83.33
in 2013
Cape Verde rank
31st
New Zealand rank
31st
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) over time
- Cape Verde
- New Zealand
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 83.33 against 83.33 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Cape Verde ranks 31st and New Zealand ranks 31st of 184 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.67 | 83.33 | 36.67 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 70.83 | 83.33 | 12.5 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14), Cape Verde or New Zealand?
- Cape Verde, at 83.33 against 83.33 in New Zealand as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) between Cape Verde and New Zealand?
- 0, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and New Zealand?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Cape Verde and New Zealand rank globally for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14)?
- Cape Verde ranks 31st and New Zealand ranks 31st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the depth of credit information benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.