Cape Verde vs United Arab Emirates: Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14)
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) over time
- Cape Verde
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 83.33 against 83.33 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 31st and United Arab Emirates ranks 31st of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and United Arab Emirates in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.67 | 33.33 | 13.33 | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 70.83 | 83.33 | 12.5 | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14), Cape Verde or United Arab Emirates?
- Cape Verde, at 83.33 against 83.33 in United Arab Emirates as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) between Cape Verde and United Arab Emirates?
- 0, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and United Arab Emirates?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Cape Verde and United Arab Emirates rank globally for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14)?
- Cape Verde ranks 31st and United Arab Emirates ranks 31st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the depth of credit information benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.