Chile vs Hong Kong, China: Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14)
Chile
83.33
in 2013
Hong Kong, China
83.33
in 2013
Chile rank
31st
Hong Kong, China rank
31st
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) over time
- Chile
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Chile currently reports 83.33 against 83.33 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 31st and Hong Kong, China ranks 31st of 184 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.33 | 83.33 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 79.17 | 83.33 | 4.17 | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14), Chile or Hong Kong, China?
- Chile, at 83.33 against 83.33 in Hong Kong, China as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) between Chile and Hong Kong, China?
- 0, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Hong Kong, China?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Chile and Hong Kong, China rank globally for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14)?
- Chile ranks 31st and Hong Kong, China ranks 31st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the depth of credit information benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.