Congo vs Syrian Arab Republic: Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14)
Congo
33.33
in 2013
Syrian Arab Republic
33.33
in 2013
Congo rank
114th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
114th
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) over time
- Congo
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Congo currently reports 33.33 against 33.33 in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
Congo ranks 114th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 114th of 184 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 25 | 8.33 | 16.67 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14), Congo or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Congo, at 33.33 against 33.33 in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) between Congo and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 0, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Congo and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14)?
- Congo ranks 114th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 114th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the depth of credit information benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.