Dominican Republic vs Ecuador: Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14)
Dominican Republic
100
in 2013
Ecuador
100
in 2013
Dominican Republic rank
1st
Ecuador rank
1st
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) over time
- Dominican Republic
- Ecuador
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 100 against 100 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 1st and Ecuador ranks 1st of 184 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.44 | 80.56 | 13.89 | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14), Dominican Republic or Ecuador?
- Dominican Republic, at 100 against 100 in Ecuador as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) between Dominican Republic and Ecuador?
- 0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Ecuador?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Dominican Republic and Ecuador rank globally for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14)?
- Dominican Republic ranks 1st and Ecuador ranks 1st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the depth of credit information benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.