Ecuador vs El Salvador: Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14)
Ecuador
100
in 2013
El Salvador
100
in 2013
Ecuador rank
1st
El Salvador rank
1st
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) over time
- Ecuador
- El Salvador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 100 against 100 in El Salvador, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 1st and El Salvador ranks 1st of 184 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.56 | 94.44 | 13.89 | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14), Ecuador or El Salvador?
- Ecuador, at 100 against 100 in El Salvador as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) between Ecuador and El Salvador?
- 0, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and El Salvador?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Ecuador and El Salvador rank globally for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14)?
- Ecuador ranks 1st and El Salvador ranks 1st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the depth of credit information benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.