Hong Kong, China vs New Zealand: Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14)
Hong Kong, China
83.33
in 2013
New Zealand
83.33
in 2013
Hong Kong, China rank
31st
New Zealand rank
31st
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) over time
- Hong Kong, China
- New Zealand
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 83.33 against 83.33 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 31st and New Zealand ranks 31st of 184 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.33 | 83.33 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 83.33 | 83.33 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14), Hong Kong, China or New Zealand?
- Hong Kong, China, at 83.33 against 83.33 in New Zealand as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) between Hong Kong, China and New Zealand?
- 0, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and New Zealand?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Hong Kong, China and New Zealand rank globally for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14)?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 31st and New Zealand ranks 31st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the depth of credit information benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.