Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Mongolia: Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14)
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) over time
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
- Mongolia
How they compare
Iran, Islamic Republic of currently reports 83.33 against 83.33 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 31st and Mongolia ranks 31st of 184 countries.
Iran, Islamic Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran, Islamic Republic of | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 33.33 | 16.67 | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
| 2010s | 75 | 70.83 | 4.17 | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14), Iran, Islamic Republic of or Mongolia?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of, at 83.33 against 83.33 in Mongolia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) between Iran, Islamic Republic of and Mongolia?
- 0, with Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran, Islamic Republic of and Mongolia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Iran, Islamic Republic of and Mongolia rank globally for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14)?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 31st and Mongolia ranks 31st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the depth of credit information benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.