Republic of Korea vs Rwanda: Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14)
Republic of Korea
100
in 2013
Rwanda
100
in 2013
Republic of Korea rank
1st
Rwanda rank
1st
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) over time
- Republic of Korea
- Rwanda
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 100 against 100 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Republic of Korea ahead.
Republic of Korea ranks 1st and Rwanda ranks 1st of 184 countries.
Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Korea | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.89 | 0 | 88.89 | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 100 | 50 | 50 | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14), Republic of Korea or Rwanda?
- Republic of Korea, at 100 against 100 in Rwanda as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) between Republic of Korea and Rwanda?
- 0, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Rwanda?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Republic of Korea and Rwanda rank globally for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14)?
- Republic of Korea ranks 1st and Rwanda ranks 1st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the depth of credit information benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.