Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Mongolia: Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14)
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
83.33
in 2013
Mongolia
83.33
in 2013
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
31st
Mongolia rank
31st
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) over time
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- Mongolia
How they compare
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) currently reports 83.33 against 83.33 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 31st and Mongolia ranks 31st of 184 countries.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.33 | 50 | 33.33 | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
| 2010s | 83.33 | 70.83 | 12.5 | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14), Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or Mongolia?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), at 83.33 against 83.33 in Mongolia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Mongolia?
- 0, with Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Mongolia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Mongolia rank globally for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14)?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 31st and Mongolia ranks 31st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the depth of credit information benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.