Kyrgyzstan vs Montenegro: Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14)
Kyrgyzstan
66.67
in 2013
Montenegro
66.67
in 2013
Kyrgyzstan rank
85th
Montenegro rank
85th
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Montenegro
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 85th and Montenegro ranks 85th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.67 | 25 | 8.33 | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 58.33 | 8.33 | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14), Kyrgyzstan or Montenegro?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Montenegro as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) between Kyrgyzstan and Montenegro?
- 0, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Montenegro?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2013.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Montenegro rank globally for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14)?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 85th and Montenegro ranks 85th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the depth of credit information benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.