Lithuania vs Saudi Arabia: Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14)
Lithuania
100
in 2013
Saudi Arabia
100
in 2013
Lithuania rank
1st
Saudi Arabia rank
1st
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) over time
- Lithuania
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 100 against 100 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Lithuania ranks 1st and Saudi Arabia ranks 1st of 184 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.22 | 69.44 | 2.78 | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14), Lithuania or Saudi Arabia?
- Lithuania, at 100 against 100 in Saudi Arabia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) between Lithuania and Saudi Arabia?
- 0, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Saudi Arabia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Lithuania and Saudi Arabia rank globally for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14)?
- Lithuania ranks 1st and Saudi Arabia ranks 1st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the depth of credit information benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.