North Macedonia vs Rwanda: Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14)
North Macedonia
100
in 2013
Rwanda
100
in 2013
North Macedonia rank
1st
Rwanda rank
1st
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) over time
- North Macedonia
- Rwanda
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 100 against 100 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Rwanda ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 1st and Rwanda ranks 1st of 184 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.67 | 0 | 16.67 | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 79.17 | 50 | 29.17 | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14), North Macedonia or Rwanda?
- North Macedonia, at 100 against 100 in Rwanda as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) between North Macedonia and Rwanda?
- 0, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Rwanda?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do North Macedonia and Rwanda rank globally for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14)?
- North Macedonia ranks 1st and Rwanda ranks 1st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the depth of credit information benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.