South Africa vs United States: Getting credit: Depth of credit information … 0-6 DB05-14 Score
South Africa
100
in 2013
United States
100
in 2013
South Africa rank
1st
United States rank
1st
Getting credit: Depth of credit information … 0-6 DB05-14 Score over time
- South Africa
- United States
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 100 against 100 in United States, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, United States has been ahead every year.
South Africa ranks 1st and United States ranks 1st of 184 countries.
United States has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.67 | 100 | 8.33 | United States |
| 2010s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14), South Africa or United States?
- South Africa, at 100 against 100 in United States as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) between South Africa and United States?
- 0, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and United States?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do South Africa and United States rank globally for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14)?
- South Africa ranks 1st and United States ranks 1st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the depth of credit information benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.