Trinidad and Tobago vs Vietnam: Getting credit: Depth of credit information … 0-6 DB05-14 Score
Trinidad and Tobago
66.67
in 2013
Vietnam
66.67
in 2013
Trinidad and Tobago rank
85th
Vietnam rank
85th
Getting credit: Depth of credit information … 0-6 DB05-14 Score over time
- Trinidad and Tobago
- Vietnam
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Vietnam, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 85th and Vietnam ranks 85th of 184 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Trinidad and Tobago | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60 | 36.67 | 23.33 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14), Trinidad and Tobago or Vietnam?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Vietnam as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) between Trinidad and Tobago and Vietnam?
- 0, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Trinidad and Tobago and Vietnam?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Trinidad and Tobago and Vietnam rank globally for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14)?
- Trinidad and Tobago ranks 85th and Vietnam ranks 85th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the depth of credit information benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.