Australia vs Latvia: Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-8)
Australia
8 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Latvia
8 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Australia rank
1st
Latvia rank
1st
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-8) over time
- Australia
- Latvia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 8 DB15-20 methodology against 8 DB15-20 methodology in Latvia, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-8), Australia or Latvia?
- Australia, at 8 DB15-20 methodology against 8 DB15-20 methodology in Latvia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-8) between Australia and Latvia?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Latvia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Latvia rank globally for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-8)?
- Australia ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-8) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The depth of credit information index measures the coverage, scope and accessibility of credit information available through credit reporting service providers such as credit bureaus or credit registries. The index ranges from 0 to 8 based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.