Afghanistan vs Antigua and Barbuda: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14)
Afghanistan
70
in 2013
Antigua and Barbuda
70
in 2013
Afghanistan rank
52nd
Antigua and Barbuda rank
52nd
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14) over time
- Afghanistan
- Antigua and Barbuda
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 70 against 70 in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 52nd and Antigua and Barbuda ranks 52nd of 184 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Antigua and Barbuda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20 | 70 | 50 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 62.5 | 70 | 7.5 | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14), Afghanistan or Antigua and Barbuda?
- Afghanistan, at 70 against 70 in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) between Afghanistan and Antigua and Barbuda?
- 0, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Antigua and Barbuda?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Afghanistan and Antigua and Barbuda rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14)?
- Afghanistan ranks 52nd and Antigua and Barbuda ranks 52nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the strength of legal rights benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.